تحلیلی بر قلمرو نظری شهر هوشمند تاب آور و تدوین چارچوب کاربست آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکترا- دانشگاه تهران

2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه شهرسازی دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشیار دانشکده شهرسازی ،پردیس هنرهای زیبا دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

        با گذشت چهارنسل تحول نظری و تجربی شهر هوشمند، انتظار بر این بود که با اتکا بر تکنولوژی­هایی نظیر اینترنت اشیا، هوش مصنوعی، رایانش ابری و نظایرآن، این نظریه راه­کار مواجهه با مسئله و حل پیچیدگی­های برنامه­ریزی تاب­آوری باشد. لکن پژوهش­­های بی­شمار اخیر، مبین خلاف آن است. ریشه مساله نه درکاربست تکنولوژی بلکه درتلفیق نظری شهر هوشمند و تاب­آوری شهری است. چگونگی دستیابی به فرمول­بندی مناسب برای گونه­شناسی رویکردهای قلمرو نظری شهرهوشمند تاب­آور(­با ترکیب مناسب ابعاد رویه ای و محتوایی) و پیشنهاد برای نحوه تلفیق، سوال این پژوهش است. لذا، هدف پژوهش حاضر، تبیین قلمرو نظری شهر هوشمند تاب­آور بین دو نظریه شهر هوشمند و تاب­آوری شهری است که با روش تحلیل محتوای سیستماتیک کمی وکیفی 42 سند از اسناد پژوهشی منتشره بین سالهای 2020-2010 و با استفاده از نرم­افزار MAXQDA20 انجام گرفته است. مطالعات نشان داد که سه گونه اصلی مطالعه تبیینی شهر هوشمند تاب­آور وجود دارد که از حیث پیوند شناختی، ارتباط عناصر، ابعاد و مولفه های دو نظریه کمتر کار شده و جامعیت تلفیقی یک نظریه واحد زیر سوال است. لذا سعی گردید پیشنهاد روشنی برای تلفیق جامعی از دو نظریه برای تعیین چارچوب نظری در تدوین سازوکار یک شهر هوشمند تاب­آور تدوین و مستدل گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

An Analytical review on the theory of smart resilient city and its applicability

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghazaleh Sadat Ghoreishi 1
  • Hamid Reza Parsi 2
  • Farshad NOURIAN 3
1 PhD student - University of Tehran
2 Faculty Member of University of Tehran
3 University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

Due to the rapid urbanization, urban planning is faced with increasingly complex problems. One such overwhelming issue is urban resilience that has created challenges both for the planners and city managers. Technologies such as IoT, Big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence etc., however, have provided new opportunities to facilitate urban planning efforts. Hence, the smart cities concept, as an innovative mix of technologies and social structure, can be seen as a solution toward making cities more livable. The technologies used in this arena provide open, massive, diverse and accessible data that can be analyzed by reliable and real-time methods to support better planning and decision-making.  In this regard, many researchers have found interest in “smart resilience city (SRC)”. This paper is a systematic literature review of such studies in order to provide a new theoretical frame for SRC planning.  Here, we have analyzed the mechanism of smart resilience city and its relation with smart city and urban resilience.  A sample of 42 related research documents, which were published in 2010-2020, are selected for our study.  In the literature, SRC attempts to connect the smart cities concept with resilience: a) to understand the major steps of creating a smart city: design and planning, modelling and simulation, implementation, technology management and evaluation; and b) to contribute to the urban resilience methods such as computational, non-computational, evaluation-based and recovery methods and their applicability in pre-, during, and post-disaster situations. The literature review showed that 35 percent of the research covered design and planning of smart city themes and nearly 75 percent discussed the non-computational methods of urban resilience. Also, they are mainly focused on proactive methods. Our review has uncovered the inadequacy of studies in both smart cities concept and urban resilience.
           Planning a smart resilience city entails both substance and procedure. “substance” consists of the hard dimension (technology, resources and procedures) and the soft dimension (people, institutions and activities). Moreover, it is revealed that the substance of SRC is formed based on 13 common characteristics: Awareness, Networking, modularity, redundancy, innovation, creativity, learning and predictability, participation, flexibility, collaboration, adaptability, efficiency and diversity. The “procedure” of SRC deals with three major approaches, including the general, thematic and local ones.  The general approach explains the frameworks of SRC or a process to achieve it.  The thematic approach contains different methods and technologies to ascertain part of SRC.  The Local approach concentrates on evaluating and lesson learned from the practical cases around the world. It is proved that the procedural approach is highly related to the expertise of researchers.  
            In conclusion, to plan for SRC, we ask the following questions: (a) How is the plan of SRC related to the steps of creating a smart city?; (b) How is it related to the states of resiliency?; (c) Which methods of resiliency are used in the SRC planning process?; and (d) What are the basic characteristics of the new SRC plan. Finally, the procedure should be designed by a multidisciplinary group based on the redefined content.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Smart resilient city
  • Smart city
  • Urban resilience
  • Smart city planning
  • Systematic review

مراجع

پوراحمد، احمد؛ زیاری، کرامت اله؛ حاتمی‌نژاد، حسین و پارسا پشاه آبادی، شهرام. 1396. مفهوم و ویژگی‌های شهر هوشمند، باغ نظر، شماره 58، صص 5-26.
مقتدری، فریناز. 1399. بازتعریف مفهوم شهرهای هوشمند و فرآیند هوشمندسازی شهرها، گفتمان طراحی شهری، دوره1، شماره2، صص 119-128.
Agrawal, M. (2019). Data Protection Law and City Planning: Role of Open Data in Climate Resilience and Governance of National Capital Territory of Delhi, India. In International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (pp. 35-51). Springer, Cham.
Almeida, M., Telhado, M., Morais, M., Barreiro, J., & Lopes, R. (2020). Urban Resilience to Flooding: Triangulation of Methods for Hazard Identification in Urban areas. Sustainability, 12(6).
Aqib, M., Mehmood, R., Alzahrani, A., & Katib, I. (2020). A smart disaster management system for future cities using deep learning, GPUs, and in-memory computing. In Smart Infrastructure and Applications (pp. 159-184). Springer, Cham. Arafah, Y., & Winarso, H. (2017). Redefining smart city concept with resilience approach. In IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 70, pp. 1-13).
Arafah, Y., Winarso, H., & Suroso, D. S. A. (2018). Towards smart and resilient city: a conceptual model. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (V. 158).
Balducci, A. (2020). Planning for Resilience. In Risk and Resilience (pp. 15-25). Springer, Cham.
Barletta, V. S., Caivano, D., Dimauro, G., Nannavecchia, A., & Scalera, M. (2020). Managing a Smart City Integrated Model through Smart Program Management. Applied Sciences, 10(2), 714.
Baron, M. (2012). Do we need smart cities for resilience?. Journal of Economics & management, 10, 32-46.
Batty, M., & Marshall, S. (2017). Thinking organic, acting civic: The paradox of planning for Cities in Evolution. Landscape and Urban Planning, 166, 4-14.
Brutti, A., De Sabbata, P., Frascella, A., Gessa, N., Ianniello, R., Novelli, C., ... & Ponti, G. (2019). Smart city platform specification: a modular approach to achieve interoperability in smart cities. In The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems (pp. 25-50). Springer, Cham.
Caputo, S., Caserio, M., Coles, R., Jankovic, L., & Gaterell, M. R. (2015). Urban resilience: two diverging interpretations. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(3), 222-240.
Cesana, M. and Redondi, A.E., )2017(. Iot communication technologies for smart cities. In Designing, Developing, and Facilitating Smart Cities (pp. 139-162). Springer, Cham.
Choudhary, P. (2016). Vernacular built environments in India: an indigenous approach for resilience. In Urban Disasters and Resilience in Asia (pp. 269-286). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Chui, K. T., Vasant, P., & Liu, R. W. (2019). Smart city is a safe city: information and communication technology–enhanced urban space monitoring and surveillance systems: the promise and limitations. In Smart Cities: Issues and Challenges (pp. 111-124). Elsevier.
Cimellaro, G. P. (2016). Urban resilience for emergency response and recovery. Switzerland: Springer.
Coaffee, J., Therrien, M. C., Chelleri, L., Henstra, D., Aldrich, D. P., Mitchell, C. L., ... & participants. (2018). Urban resilience implementation: A policy challenge and research agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(3), 403-410.
Colding, J., Barthel, S., & Sörqvist, P. (2019). Wicked problems of smart cities. Smart Cities, 2(4), 512-521.
Cui, L., Xie, G., Qu, Y., Gao, L. and Yang, Y., )2018(. Security and privacy in smart cities: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE access, 6, pp.46134-46145.
da Silva, C.A., dos Santos, E.A., Maier, S.M. and da Rosa, F.S., 2019. Urban resilience and sustainable development policies. Revista de Gestão.
Dameri, R. P. (2017). Urban smart dashboard. Measuring smart city performance. In Smart City Implementation (pp. 67-84). Springer, Cham.
De Falco, S., Angelidou, M. and Addie, J.P.D., )2019(. From the “smart city” to the “smart metropolis”? Building resilience in the urban periphery. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(2), pp.205-223.
Doyle, A., Hynes, W., Ehimen, E., Purcell, S. M., Coaffee, J., Clarke, J., & Davis, P. (2018). Operationalising Resilience within Planning Practice: Towards an Online Decision Support Model. In E-Planning and Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 662-678). IGI Global.
El-Kholei, A. O. (2019). Risks, hazards, and disasters: can a smart city be resilient?. In Smart Cities: Issues and Challenges (pp. 125-146). Elsevier.
Elmaghraby, A. S., & Losavio, M. M. (2014). Cyber security challenges in Smart Cities: Safety, security and privacy. Journal of advanced research, 5(4), 491-497.
Ernstson, H., Van der Leeuw, S. E., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., & Elmqvist, T. (2010). Urban transitions: on urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio, 39(8), 531-545.
Fainstein, S., )2015(. Resilience and justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), pp.157-167. Founoun, A., & Hayar, A. (2018). Evaluation of the concept of the smart city through local regulation and the importance of local initiative. In 2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Gardner, N., & Hespanhol, L. (2018). SMLXL: Scaling the smart city, from metropolis to individual. City, Culture and Society, 12, 54-61.
Garnett, R. and Adams, M.D., )2018(. LIDAR—A technology to assist with smart cities and climate change resilience: A case study in an urban metropolis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(5), p.161.
Goh, K. (2015). Who’s smart? Whose city? The sociopolitics of urban intelligence. In Planning support systems and smart cities (pp. 169-187). Springer, Cham.
Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage.
Gunasingh, S., Wang, N., Ahl, D., & Schuetter, S. (2017). Climate resilience and the design of smart buildings. Smart Cities: Foundations, Principles, and Applications, 641-667.
Hatuka, T., Rosen-Zvi, I., Birnhack, M., Toch, E., & Zur, H. (2018). The political premises of contemporary urban concepts: The global city, the sustainable city, the resilient city, the creative city, and the smart city. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 160-179.
Hayajneh, A. M., Zaidi, S. A. R., McLernon, D. C., & Ghogho, M. (2016). Drone empowered small cellular disaster recovery networks for resilient smart cities. In 2016 IEEE international conference on sensing, communication and networking (SECON Workshops) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Heurkens, E., Remøy, H., & Hobma, F. (2018). Planning Policy Instruments for Resilient Urban Redevelopment: The Case of Office Conversions in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Building Urban Resilience through Change of Use, 39-56.
Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley.
Hu, X., & Gong, J. (2018). Advancing Smart and Resilient Cities with Big Spatial Disaster Data: Challenges, Progress, and Opportunities. In Data Analytics for Smart Cities (pp. 53-90). Auerbach Publications.
Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Raman, K. R. (2019). Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 47, pp. 88-100.
Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Rana, N.P. and Dwivedi, Y.K., )2020(. Security, privacy and risks within smart cities: Literature review and development of a smart city interaction framework. Information Systems Frontiers, pp.1-22.
Janitra, M. R. (2020). Implementation of smart city for building disaster resilience in West Java Province. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 592, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing.
Kaika, M., )2017(. ‘Don’t call me resilient again!’: the New Urban Agenda as immunology… or… what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with ‘smart cities’ and indicators. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), pp.89-102. Kavehvash, Z., )2016(. Improved multi-camera smart traffic surveillance system for resilient cities. Scientia Iranica, 23(4), pp.1641-1647. Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the royal society of medicine, 96(3), 118-121.
Kim, K. G. (2018). Low-Carbon Smart Cities. Springer.
Kim, T., )2017(. Smart and resilient urban disaster debris cleanup using network analysis. Spatial Information Research, 25(2), pp.239-248.
Kotevska, O., Kusne, A.G., Samarov, D.V., Lbath, A. and Battou, A., )2017(. Dynamic network model for smart city data-loss resilience case study: City-to-city network for crime analytics. IEEE Access, 5, pp.20524-20535.
Klein, B., Koenig, R. and Schmitt, G., 2017. Managing urban resilience. Informatik-Spektrum, 40(1), pp.35-45.
Kulkarni, A. R., Rajurkar, S. S., & Ballal, M. S. (2018). Wide Area Monitoring System (WAMS): The Foundation Block of Smartgrids for Event Analysis. In International Conference and Exhibition on Smart Grids and Smart Cities (pp. 37-50). Springer, Singapore.
Liao, K. H. (2012). A theory on urban resilience to floods—a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and society, 17(4).
Lom, M., & Pribyl, O. (2020). Smart city model based on systems theory. International Journal of Information Management. Vol.(56).
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and urban planning, 147, 38-49.
Moraci, F., Errigo, M.F., Fazia, C., Burgio, G. and Foresta, S., )2018(. Making less vulnerable cities: Resilience as a new paradigm of smart planning. Sustainability, 10(3),p.755.
Muvuna, J., Boutaleb, T., Mickovski, S. B., & Baker, K. J. (2016). Systems engineering approach to design and modelling of smart cities. In 2016 International Conference for Students on Applied Engineering (ICSAE) (pp. 437-440). IEEE.
Muvuna, J., Boutaleb, T., Mickovski, S.B. and Baker, K.J., )2016(. Systems engineering approach to design and modelling of smart cities. In 2016 International Conference for Students on Applied Engineering (ICSAE) (pp. 437-440). IEEE.
Nel, D., & Nel, V. (2019). Governance for resilient smart cities. In international council for research and innovation in building and construction (CIB), World Building Congress.
Noori, N., de Jong, M., Janssen, M., Schraven, D., & Hoppe, T. (2020). Input-output modeling for smart city development. Journal of Urban Technology, 1-22.
Normandin, J. M., Therrien, M. C., Pelling, M., & Paterson, S. (2019). The definition of urban resilience: A transformation path towards collaborative urban risk governance. In Urban resilience for risk and adaptation governance (pp. 9-25). Springer, Cham.
Papa, R., Galderisi, A., Vigo Majello, M. C., & Saretta, E. (2015). Smart and resilient cities. A systemic approach for developing cross-sectoral strategies in the face of climate change. TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 8(1), 19-49.
Pelton, J. N., & Singh, I. B. (2019). How Nations and Smart Cities Can Cope with Cyber-Terrorism and Warfare. In Smart Cities of Today and Tomorrow (pp. 185-201). Copernicus, Cham.
Pittway, L. (2008). Systematic literature reviews. In The SAGE dictionary of qualitative management research. SAGE Publications.
Qadir, Z., Ullah, F., Munawar, H.S. and Al-Turjman, F., 2021. Addressing disasters in smart cities through UAVs path planning and 5G communications: A systematic review. Computer Communications.
Ragia, L., & Antoniou, V. (2020). Making Smart Cities Resilient to Climate Change by Mitigating Natural Hazard Impacts. Geo-Information, 9(3).
Ribeiro, P. & Gonçalves, L. (2019). Urban resilience: A conceptual framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50. Seidenstricker, S., & Antonino, A. (2018). Business Model Innovation-Oriented Technology Management for Emergent Technologies. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition (pp. 4560-4569). IGI Global.
Sengan, S., Subramaniyaswamy, V., Nair, S. K., Indragandhi, V., Manikandan, J., & Ravi, L. (2020). Enhancing cyber–physical systems with hybrid smart city cyber security architecture for secure public data-smart network. Future generation computer systems, 112.
Shah, S.A., Seker, D.Z., Rathore, M.M., Hameed, S., Yahia, S.B. and Draheim, D., )2019(. Towards disaster resilient smart cities: Can internet of things and big data analytics be the game changers?. IEEE Access, 7, pp.91885-91903.
Sulthan, I. (2020). Damage and Exposure Prevention of Energy Infrastructure Through Strategies in PEER: Evolving Trends for Efficiency, Reliability, and Resiliency. In International Conference and Exhibition on Smart Grids and Smart Cities (pp. 17-24). Springer, Singapore.
Suri, N., Zielinski, Z., Tortonesi, M., Fuchs, C., Pradhan, M., Wrona, K., ... & Dyk, M. (2018). Exploiting smart city IoT for disaster recovery operations. In 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) (pp. 458-463). IEEE. Tasleem, M., Khan, N., & Nisar, A. (2019). Impact of technology management on corporate sustainability performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
UNISDR. (2016). UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva.
Velásquez, W., Munoz-Arcentales, A., Yanez, W., & Salvachúa, J. (2018). Resilient smart cities: An approach of damaged cities by natural risks. In 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) (pp. 591-597). IEEE.
Viitanen, J., & Kingston, R. (2014). Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environment and Planning A, 46(4).
Wamsler, C., Niven, L., Beery, T. H., Bramryd, T., Ekelund, N., Jönsson, K. I., ... & Stålhammar, S. (2016). Operationalizing ecosystem-based adaptation: harnessing ecosystem services to buffer communities against climate change. Ecology and Society, 21(1).
Wang, J. (2017). Toward Resilience of the Electric Grid. In Smart Cities: Foundations, Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Yigitcanlar, T. (2018). Smart city policies revisited: Considerations for a truly smart and sustainable urbanism practice. World Technopolis Rev, 7(2).
Yigitcanlar, T., Butler, L., Windle, E., Desouza, K. C., Mehmood, R., & Corchado, J. M. (2020). Can Building “Artificially Intelligent Cities” Safeguard Humanity from Natural Disasters, Pandemics, and Other Catastrophes? An Urban Scholar’s Perspective. Sensors, 20(10).
Zhu, S., & Li, D. (2019). A Comprehensive Evaluation for Disaster Resilience of Smart Cities in China. In ICCREM 2019: Innovative Construction Project Management and Construction Industrialization (pp. 733-740). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Zhu, S., Li, D., & Feng, H. (2019). Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China. Sustainable Cities and Society, No.50.
Zhu, S., Li, D., Feng, H., Gu, T., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2020). Smart city and resilient city: Differences and connections. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(6).
نشریه هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی
دوره 25، شماره 4
بهمن 1399
صفحه 55-69

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار