چارچوب فرآیند طراحی برای استفاده مجدد از ساختمان های موجود، نمونه موردی : سیلوی قدیم گندم شیراز

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه معماری،دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی،دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود،شاهرود،ایران،

2 دانشگاه شیراز، دانشکده هنر و معماری، گروه معماری

3 استادیار دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود

چکیده

با توجه به روند توسعه و تغییر در جوامع امروزی و زوال اجتناب‌ناپذیر ساختمان‌ها، بهسازی و استفاده مجدد تطبیقی، یکی از مناسب‌ترین گزینه‌ها جهت انطباق با شرایط و نیازهای جدید هر بنا است. این عمل چه در مراحل اولیه تصمیم‌گیری و چه در فرآیند طراحی و انتخاب کاربری جایگزین به علت موارد متعدد دخیل در تصمیم‌گیری، با پیچیدگی‌هایی مواجه است. بنابراین در این مسیر، چارچوب و سیر مشخص و سیستماتیکی جهت کنترل و هدایت امر نیاز است. نظر به عدم ارائه چنین چارچوبی در ایران، در این مطالعه سعی شده‌است تا با بررسی پتانسیل استفاده مجدد تطبیقی از یک ساختمان موجود و بررسی نحوه‌ی تعیین کاربری جایگزین مناسب برای آن، ضمن معرفی مدل‌های آکادمیک، روند تصمیم‌گیری به عنوان یک الگو قابل استفاده باشد. بدین منظور، سیلوی قدیم شهر شیراز به عنوان نمونه انتخاب و ضمن پتانسیل­سنجی، فرآیند انتخاب کاربری جایگزین نیز معرفی گردیده‌است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که پتانسیل سیلو برای استفاده مجدد تطبیقی، بالا و نیز کاربری مناسب جایگزین برای آن فرهنگی- گردشگری است. دستاورد این مطالعه می‌تواند به عنوان یک الگو برای طراحان و معماران برای استفاده مجدد تطبیقی از ساختمان‌های موجود با عمر کالبدی حداقل 20 سال و در بافت‌های شهری قابل استفاده باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Design process framework for reusing existing buildings Case Study: Old Wheat Silo of Shiraz

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Eftekhar 1
  • Maryam Ekhtiari 2
  • Masoud Taheri Shahraeini 3
1 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism , Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
2 Department of Architecture , Art & Architecture faculty, Shiraz university, Shiraz
3 Assistant professor of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism faculty at Shahrood University of Technology
چکیده [English]

The process of change and development in today’s societies has affected buildings too, in a way that their wear and deterioration is inevitable. Eventually, they may be deserted and no longer be suitable to serve their primary purpose, or due to lack of demand for their services, they may be made redundant. Under such circumstances, naturally, their initial usage does not fulfill the current requirements. Therefore, the possibility of upgrading and reusing as well as creating a different usage in order to adapt a building to the new conditions and needs may be assessed. Today’s societies face the problem of dealing with the deserted buildings that they have inherited. Meanwhile, revival through creation of a new function and adaptive reuse of such buildings give a new life to the building, instead of restoration and various types of maintenance for instance in a museum. This also returns it to the urban life cycle, which is one of the ideal available alternatives to the today’s societies. Buildings and the industrial heritage that are left in the heart of urban centers, are results of the deindustrialization in urban settings in the country over the recent years. The heritage of the past industry, by protecting such areas as a symbol of the history of modernism in Iran, is known as “industrial heritage”. The industrial heritage links the contemporary age to the past and reinforces the spirit of the place. This place can be considered as a space where collective memories are revived and preserved. Some of the issues discussed in relation to the industrial heritage are: physical recovery and changing the functional structure, adapting the industrial heritage to the needs and requirements of today’s society, and an economic revival through creation of new usages in order to make the industrial buildings profitable. Therefore, adaptive rehabilitation and reuse are the most suitable options for adaptation to the new requirements and needs of each individual building. This process, both in the early stages of decision-making and in the design and alternative use selection process, is faced with complexities due to the many factors involved in the decision making. Therefore, a clear and systematic framework and course of action are needed to control and guide the process. Due to lack of such a framework in Iran, this study seeks to investigate the potential for adaptive reuse of an existing building and examine how to determine the appropriate alternative for it. This is done by introducing academic models, to use a template for the decision making process. For this purpose, the old silo of Shiraz was selected as a sample. In addition to assessing its potential, the alternative use selection process was introduced. The results indicate that the silo has a high potential for adaptive reuse, and an appropriate alternative use for the silo is a cultural tourist attraction. The results of this study can be used as a template for adaptive reuse of existing buildings by designers and architects.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Building Adaptation
  • Adaptive Reuse
  • Decision-making model
  • Assessing Potential
بنازاده، ب (1391)،بهسازی و طراحی مجدد کارگاهی صنعتی در منطقه4 شیراز با رویکرد پایداری، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ .

Alanne, K & Klobut, K (2003), A decision-making tool to support integration of sustainable technologies in refurbishment projects Building Simulation, Eindhoven-Netherlands.

Arup, E.B.S.S (2008), Existing Building: Survival Strategies: A Toolbox for Re-energising Tired Assets, Arup and Property Council of Australia (PCA), Victorian Division, Australia.

Ball, R (1999), Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant buildings, Building Research and Information, 27(3), pp.140-148

Cantell, S.F (2005), The adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings: regulation barriers, best practices and case studies, The adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings: Regulation barrier, best practices and case studies, Master Thesis: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.

Conejos, S & Langston, C (2010), Designing for future building adaptive reuse using adaptSTAR, International Conference on Sustainable Urbanization, Hong Kong, China.

Douglas, James (2006), Building Adaptation, Routledge, London

Farrell-Lipp, H.L (2008), Strategies between old and new: Adaptive use of an industrial building, Master thesis: University of Cincinnati.

Geraedts, R.P & Van der Voordt, D (2007), A tool to measure opportunities and risks of converting empty offices into dwellings, in Proceedings of International conference Sustainable urban areas, Roterdam.

Ijla, A. and T. Broström (2015), The Sustainable Viability of Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings: the experiences of Two World Heritage Old Cities; Bethlehem in Palestine and Visby in Sweden, International Invention Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 2(4), pp. 52-66. 32.

Kincaid, D (2003), Adapting buildings for changing uses: guidelines for change of use refurbishment, Routledge, London.

Langston, C & Shen, L.Y (2007), Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: A case study of Lui Seng Chun, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11(4), pp. 193-207.

Langston, C; Wong, Francis  K. W; Hui, Eddie C. M & Shen, Livin (2008), Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong, Building and Environment, 43(10), pp. 1709-1718

Langston, Craig; Liu, Chunlu; Beynon, David; de Jong, Ursula; Langston, Yu Lay; Merlino, Dean; Haynes, Tom; Bennett, Kirsty & Williams, Peter (2010), Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities ARC Linkage Project LP0776579 Final report 2010, Mirvac School of Sustainable Development.Paper 141.

Langston, C; Yung , E.H.-K & Chan, E.H.-W (2013), The application of ARP modelling to adaptive reuse projects in Hong Kong,  Habitat International, 40, pp.233-243.

Mısırlısoy, D & Günçe, K (2016), Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: a holistic approach, Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, pp. 91-98.

Ohemeng, F.A (1998), Rehabilitation versus demolition and redevelopment: a value-based decision framework for private commercial properties, Ph.D. thesis,University of Salford.

Penlington, H (2010), Dirty laundry: The adaptive reuse of an existing building, Master thesis:Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Rosenfeld, Y & Shohet, I. M (1999), Decision support model for semi-automated selection of renovation alternatives, Automation in Construction, 8(4), pp. 503-510.

Tan, Y; Shen, L.-y & Langston, C (2014),  A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), pp. 66-76.

Teo, EAL & Lin, G (2011), Building adaption model in assessing adaption potential of public housing in Singapore, Building and Environment, Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1370-9.

Wilkinson, S (2011), The relationship between building adaptation and property attributes, Ph.D. thesis, Deakin University.

Yin, H & Menzel, K (2011), Decision support model for building renovation strategies, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 76, pp. 245-252.

Zavadskas, E.K; Kaklauskas, Arturas; Tupeniate, Laura & Mickatyte, Aiste, (2008), Decision-making model for sustainable buildings refurbishment. Energy efficiency aspect, in The 7th International conference Environmental engineering.