• اشعری، سمیرا. نائینی، حسن (1401). بررسی جنبههای ذاتی طراحی از منظر پژوهشگران حوزه تفکر طراحی. هنرهای زیبا- هنرهای تجسمی، 27(2)، 93-101. http:// 10.22059/jfava.2021.322422.666682 •
پالاسما، یوهانی (1398). دست متفکر: حکمت وجود متجسد در معماری (چاپ سوم (علیاکبری، مترجم). تهران: پرهام نقش. (چاپ اثر اصلی 2009) •
تفضلی، زهره (1392). مقدماتی درباره حافظه و نقش آن در تفکر طراحی. صفه، 23(1)، 17-30. http:// 20.1001.1.1683870.1392.23.1.2.4 •
• کاروان، فرهاد (1400). فرایند طراحی: از ایده تا عرضه بر اساس تفکر تأملی و سبکهای یادگیری در هنرجویان معماری. صفه، (2)31، 23-38 http:// doi: 10.52547/sofeh.31.2.23
• کراس، نایجل (1395). راههای طراحانه دانستن، (حمیدرضا شریف، مترجم). شیراز: دانشگاه شیراز. (چاپ اثر اصلی 2006) • گرجی مهلبانی، یوسف (1386). تفکر طراحی و الگوهای فرایندی آن. صفه، 16(3-4)، 106-123 http:// 20.1001.1.1683870.1386.16.3.7.8
• لاوسون، برایان (1392). طراحان چگونه میاندیشند (ابهامزدایی از فرایند طراحی) (حمید ندیمی مترجم). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1980) • محمودآبادی، علیرضا. میرجانی، حمید. (1401). نسبت تفکر طراحی معماری با طرحوارههای ناسازگار. اندیشه معماری، 6(12)، 1-16 http:// 10.30479/at.2022.16531.1830
• محمودی، سید امیرسعید. ذاکری، سید محمدحسین (1390). استخراج دانش کاربردی از پیشینهها و تأثیر آن بر خلاقیت در طراحی معماری. نشریه هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی، 3(47)، 39-50 http:// 20.1001.1.22286020.1390.3.47.4.0
• میرجانی، حمید. (1388). رجوع معمارانه به گذشته: جستجوی روشی جهت کسب دانش عملی طراحی از طریق تجربه مصادیق معماری. ] رساله دکتری معماری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی [. تهران
• نیرومند شیشوان، مهدیه و قرهبگلو، مینو (1403). شناسایی انواع تخیل در اثر معماری مبتنی بر دیدگاه فلسفۀ عصبشناسی (تحلیل چند مصداق از معماری معاصر جهان)، باغ نظر. 21(131)، 5-18 http:// doi: 10.22034/bagh.2024.419224.5461
• نیکفطرت، مرتضی (1399). خوانشی بر اندیشه های مرلوپونتی در معماری، یازدهمین کنفرانس ملی شهرسازی، معماری، عمران و محیط زیست، شیروان،
https://civilica.com/doc/1153529
• هیل، جاناتان (1396). مرلوپونتی برای معماران (گلناز صالح کریمی مترجم). تهران: کتاب فکر نو. (چاپ اثر اصلی 2016)
• Ashari, S., & Naeini, H. (2022). Investigating the Intrinsic Aspects of Design from the Perspective of Researchers in the Field of Design Thinking [Barresi janbehaye zati tarahi az manzare pajuheshgarane hoze tafakore tarahi]. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Honar-Ha-Ye-Tajassomi, 27(2), 93-101. http://doi: 10.22059/jfava.2021.322422.666682 (In Persion)
• Burnette, C (2022). The Embodied Senses in Purposeful Thought and Design. access in 4/23/23 from https://www.independent.academia.edu/charlesburnette access
• Cross, Nigel. (2016). Designerly Ways of Knowing [Rah-haye tarahane danestan] (Hamid Reza Sharif, Trans.). Shiraz University. (Origional work published 2006) (In Persion)
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1910) • Diethelm, J. (2019). Embodied design thinking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(1), 44-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.02.001
• Di Mascio, D. (2021). EAEA15: Envisioning Architectural Narratives: Introduction. In 15th Biennial International Conference of the European Architectural Envisioning Association: Envisioning Architectural Narratives, 13-21. University of Huddersfield
• Erwine, B. (2016). Creating sensory spaces: The architecture of the invisible. Taylor & Francis
• Erwine, Barbara. (2021). A Puddle of Quiet: The Power of Story and Metaphor in Sensory Design. Conference: EAEA15: Envisioning Architectural NarrativesAt: https://pure.hud.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/39575722/Danilo_Di_Mascio_Monograph_EAEA15_Envisioning_Architectural_Narratives.pdf: 367-378
• Faridizad A M. (2016). Demystifying of Design Thinking and its Principles [Ebhamzodayi az tafakor tarahi va shakeshaye an]. mth. 6(11), 25-37. URL: http://mth.aui.ac.ir/article-1-494-en.html (In Persion)
• Feizi, M., & khakzand, M. (2006). Design thinking in architectural design process [Tafakore tarahi dar farayand tarahi memari]. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 2(4), 13-23. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_126.html (In Persion)
• Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 358, 517–528
• Gallese, V. (2011). Embodied simulation theory: imagination and narrative. Neuropsychoanalysis, 13(2), 196-200 • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA, 1(2).
• Gorgi Mahlabani, Y. (2007). Design thinking and its processing patterns [Tafakor tarahi va olguhaye pardazesh]. Soffeh, 16(3), 106-123. http://20.1001.1.1683870.1386.16.3.7.8 (In Persion)
• Head, H., & Holmes, G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34, 102-254
• Hill, J. (2017). Merleau-Ponty for Architects [Merloponty baraye memaran] (Golnaz Saleh Karimi Trans.). Fekr-e No Publishing. (Origional work published 2016) (In Persion)
• Iran-Nejad, A. (1989). A nonconnectionist schema theory of understanding surprise-ending stories. Discourse Processes, 12(2), 127-148
• James, A. & Brookfield, S. (2014). Engaging Imagination: Helping Students Become Creative and Reflective Thinkers. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
• Jelić, A., Tieri, G., De Matteis, F., Babiloni, F., & Vecchiato, G. (2016). The enactive approach to architectural experience: A neurophysiological perspective on embodiment, motivation, and affordances. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 481.
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J. & Çetinkaya, M. 2013. Design Thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121- 146
https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
• Karvan, F. (2021). Design Process: from Idea to Presentation, based on Reflective Thought and Learning Styles in Architecture Students. [Farayande tarahi: az ide ta arze bar asase tafakore taamoli va sabkhaye yadgiri dar honarjuane mamari]. Soffeh, 31(2), 23-38. doi: 10.52547/sofeh.31.2.23 (In Persion)
• Kember, D., Leung, D. Y., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., ... & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 25(4), 381-395
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press
• Lawson, B. (2004). What designers know. Architectural Press: Oxford (England)
• Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think: The design process demystified [Tarahan chegune miandishnd: ebhamzodai az farayand-e tarahi] (Hamid Nadimi, Trans.). Shahid Beheshti University. (Origional work published 1980) (In Persion) • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. London: Routledge
• Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2013). Design expertise. London: Routledge
• Lindgaard, K., & Wesselius, H. (2017). Once more, with feeling: Design thinking and embodied cognition. She ji: The journal of design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 83-92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.05.004
• Mahmoodabadi, A., & Mirjany, H. (2022). The ratio of architectural design thinking to incompatible schemas [Nesbate tafakor tarahi ba tarhvarehaye nasazegar]. Journal of Architectural Thought, 6(12), 1-16. doi: 10.30479/at.2022.16531.1830 (In Persion)
• Malinin, L. (2018). Situated Design-Thinking in Architectural Practice: Analyzing and Extending Schön’s Epistemology. Ardeth. A magazine on the power of the project, (2), 52-75.
https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth/754
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes. Northwestern University Press • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of perception. London: Taylor and Francis e-Library
• Mirjani, H. (2009). Architectural Reference to the Past: Searching for a Method to Acquire Practical Design Knowledge through the Experience of Architectural Samples [Rojue be gozashte: Jostojue raveshi jahate kasbe daneshe amali tarahi az tarighe tagrebe masadighe memari] [Doctoral Thesis in Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University]. Tehran (In Persion) • Mozaffar, F., & kianersi, M. (2019). The Main Factors of Promoting Designerly Thinking (Conventional and Situation-based Thinking) in Teaching the Basics of Architectural Designing [Moalefehaye asli parvaresh tafakor tarahane dar amozesh moghadamat tarahi memari]. Baghe Nazar Journal, 9 (18), 1-18. http://mmi.aui.ac.ir/article-1-521-fa.html (In Persion) • Nikfetrat, M. (2019). The reading on Merleau-Ponty's philosophy in architecture [Khaneshi bar andishehaye merloponty dar memari]. 11th National Conference on the Urban Planning, Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environment.Shirvan. https://civilica.com/doc/1153529 (In Persion)
• Niroumand Shishavan, M., & Gharehbaglou, M. (2024). Identifying Types of Imagination in Architectural Work Based on Neurophilosophy Perspective (Analysis of some Examples of the World’s Contemporary Architecture) [Shenasayi anvae takhayol dar asare memari mobtani bar didgahe falsafaye asab-shenasi]. Baghe Nazar Journal, 21(131), 5-18. (In Persion) doi: 10.22034/bagh.2024.419224.5461
• Palasma, J. (2019). The Thinking Hand: Existential Wisdom in Architecture [Daste motafaker: hekmate vogudi memari] (Ali Akbari, Trans.). Parham Naqsh. (Orgional work published 2009) (In Persion)
• Schilder, P. (1935). The image and appearance of the human body: Studies in the constructive energies of the psyche. New York: International University Press.
• Sharif, H. R. (2015). Student-teacher interaction in architectural design studio: teacher’s critical thinking & students’ creative thinking [Taamole modares va daneshju dar kargahe tarahi memari]. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 16(64), 23-38. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2015.7951 (In Persion)
• Sharif, H. R., & Nadimi, H. (2013). Ideation versus Idea Processing in Architectural Design Thinking [Taamole bayne ideyabi va pardazeshe ide dar tafakor tarahi memari]. Soffeh, 23(3), 19-26. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1392.23.3.2.8 (In Persion)
• Tafazzoli, Z (2013). Memory and Architectural Thinking [Moghadamati darbare hafeze va naghsh an dar tafakor tarahi]. Soffeh, 23(1), 17-30. http://20.1001.1.1683870.1392.23.1.2.4 (In Persion)
• Tanaka, S. (2013). The notion of embodied knowledge and its range. encyclopaideia, 37, 47-66
• Van Rompay, T., & Ludden, G. (2015). Types of embodiment in design: The embodied foundations of meaning and affect in product design. International journal of design, 9(1). https://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1670