Measuring Quality of Urban Life in Tehran Metropolitan

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran

3 Ph.D Candidate of Urban & Regioanal Planning, Faculty of Urban Planning, University Collage of Fine Arts, University of Tehran

4 M.A of Urban & Regioanal Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran.

5 M.A of Social development, Faculty Social Science, University of Tehran, Tehran


The main goal of the development plans is to create livable environment, better quality of life and residential satisfaction. Thus, the city managers desire to achieve this goal and plan a livable city for the people through the strategies, policies and intra-organizational programs, as well as making interaction with other influential administrations on the development of the city. As well as the urban development plans, the programs of the governmental and private organizations which somehow targeting the urban society, influence the quality of the people`s life. Quality of life can be conceptualized as an overallmeasure or as a measure based on experiences in a variety of domains, such that the greater the satisfaction withvarious life domains, including personal health, consuming, work, family and leisure, the greater the satisfactionwith life in general. Economic, subjective and social indices can all shed light on a society’s quality of life, as well as on how specific factors influence well-being.QOL consists of two distinct global concepts with underlying domains: perceived QOL andthe environmental QOL. Perceived QOL domains includessatisfaction with family life, friends, health, partner and oneself . The environmental QOL domains include satisfaction with housing, schools, health services,safety and security, roads and transport and jobs.Thus Measuring Quality of Life and analyzing the determinants of the differences in Qol between cities, neighborhoods and households is extremely important to provide inputs for policy action and to help determine priorities and actions for urban infrastructure and other interventions. Therefore, evaluating the quality of Urban life in Tehran, being affected from many factors, for instance what the city managers and governmental and public organizations done, would be very crucial and could provide a framework to make a road map for the city managers to survey the existing situation and move toward the ideal situation. The main goals of this research are as: defining the indicators and measures for surveying the quality of life and measuring the quality of life in Tehran. According to the subjective approach of the evaluation, the research method is based on the survey method which applies questionnaires to collect data. To analyze the data, various statistical methods have been applied, e.g. factor analysis and regression analysis methods. During the process of the evaluating the quality of life in Tehran, different results have been achieved. The literature review of the study results in defining the theoretical framework and conceptual model of the research, as well as documenting more than 90 quality of life indicators from the academic researches, the experiences of other cities and the research of the international organizations. In the next sections, based on localized indicators, the data from 114 quarters of Tehran has been collected through 12000 questionnaires and then analyzed by the mentioned methods. The findings of the research reveals that the quality of life in Tehran consists of 19 key factors. Specifying the areas which have to be intervened and prioritizing the interventions according to the 114 quarters of the city of Tehran are the other important findings of the research.


[1] زبردست، اسفندیار، خلیـلی، احمد و دهقانی، مصطفی(1392)، کاربرد روش تحلیل عاملی در شناسایی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری، نشریه هنرهای زیبا، معماری و شهرسازی، دوره 18 ،شماره ۲ ، صص 27-42.
[2] ADB) 2001(,Urban Indicators for Managing Cities: Cities Data Book. Eds., M.S. Westfall and V. A. de Villa. Manila: ADB. [3] Baldwin, Sally., Godfrey, Christine., and Propper, Carol. (1990), Quality of life: Perspectives and Policies, Routledge.
[4] Berger M, Blomquist G, Sabirianovapeter K. (2008); Compensating differentials in emerging labor and housing markets: Estimates of quality of life in Russian cities. Journal of Urban Economics,63(1):25-55.
[5] Blomquist, G.C., Berger, M.C., Hoehn, J.P (1988). New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. American Economic Review 78 (1), 89-107.
[6] Bostock Marketing Group Ltd(2008) Quality of Life Survey, Prepared for: Liverpool City Council ,
[7] Boyer, R., Savageau, D. (1981).Places Rated Almanac. Rand McNelly, Chicago.
[8] Das, D.( 2008) “Urban Quality of Life: A case study of Guwahati”, Social Indicators Research, 88.
[9] Diener. E, and Eunkook, Suh. (1997), Measuring Quality of Life: Economic, Social, and Subjective Indicators, Social Indicators Research, 40.
[10] Economist(2005)TheEconomistIntelligenceUnit’sQuality-of-LifeIndex. ,
[11] El-osta HS ;(2007). The Determinants of a Quality of Life Indicator for Farm Operator Households : Application of Zero-Inflated Count-Data Models. Quality:145-163.
[12] Fahy F, Cinnéide MÓ.(2008). Developing and testing an operational framework for assessing quality of life. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ;28:366 - 379.
[13] Federation of Canadian Municipalities(2004) The FCM Quality of Life Reporting System. Quality of Life in Canadian Municipalities. Available at:
[14] Felce, D., and Perry, J. (1995), Quality of Life: Its Definitions and Measurement, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol.16, No.1.
[15] International Institute for Sustainable Development(IISD), (1998),Canada Board Room, City of Winnipeg Quality of Life Indicators.
[16] Ji J. (2002),Determinants of Family Life Satisfaction in Reforming Urban China. International Journal of Comparative Sociology;43(2):169-191.
[17] Khizindar, M. Tariq. (2009), Quality of Life in Developing Countries: An Empirical Investigation, The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge , Vol. 14 , No. 2.
[18] Lee, Yung-Jaan. (2008), Subjective Quality of Life Measurement in Taipei, Building and Environment, 43.
[19] Liu, B.C. (1976).Quality of Life Indicators in US Metropolitan Areas: A Statistical Analysis", Praeger, New York.
[20] London Sustainable Development Commission (2004), Report on London’s Quality of Life Indicators,
[21] Massam,H. Brayn. (2002), Quality of Life: Public Planning and Private Living, Progress in Planning ,58.
[22] Mccrea ROD, Stimson R, Western J. (2005),Testing a moderated model of satisfaction with urban living using data for brisbane-south east queensland, australia. Social Indicators Research:121-152.
[23] Mcmahon SK. (2002)The development of quality of life indicators — a case study from the City of Bristol , UK. Ecological Indicators:177-185.
[24] Mercer Human Resource Consulting LLC(2007) " Defining Quality of Living" ,
[25] Phillips, D. (2006), Quality of Life: Concept, Policy and Practice, Routledge .
[26] Rapley, M. (2003), Quality of Life Research, Sage Publications Ltd, London .
[27] RIVM, )2002(. In: Bouwman, A., van Kamp, I., van Poll, R. (Eds.),Report 630950 00x Workshopverslag Leefomgevingskwaliteit II. Verslag Workshop, 18 December 2001, in press.
[28] R. Epley, Donald and Menon, Mohan. 2008, A Method of Assembling Cross-sectional Indicators into a Community Quality of Life, Social Indicators Research, NO. 88.
[29] Romney, David M., Roy I. Brown, and Prem S. Fry. (1994).Improving the quality of life: Prescriptions for change. Social Indicators Research. 33: 237-72.
[30] Santos LD, Martins I, Brito P. (2007) Measuring Subjective Quality of Life : A Survey to Porto ’ s Residents. Quality:51-64.
[31] Schuessler, and G A Fisher. (1985), Quality of life Research and Sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 11: 129-149.
[32] Sirgy, M. Joseph., Rahtz, Donr., Cicic, Muris., and Underwood, Robert. (2000), A Method for Assessing Resident's Satisfaction With Community –Based Services: A Quality -of-Life Perspective, Social Indicators Research,Vol. 49 .
[33] Stover, M.E., Leven, C.L. (1992),.Methodological issues in the determination of the quality of life in urban areas. Urban Studies 29 (5), 737-754.
[34] Sufian, A.J.M. (1993).A multivariate analysis of the determinants of urban quality of life in the world's largest metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 30(8):1319-1329.
[35] Turksever, A. N., & Atalik, G. ( 2000). Possibilities Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research :163-187.
[36] Turksever, N. Evcil., and Gunduz, Atalik. (2001), Possibilities and Limitations for the Measurement of the Quality of Life in Urban Areas, Social Indicators Research,Vol. 53.
[37] Ulengin, B. Ulengin, F. Guvenc, U. (2001)."A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul". European Journal of Operational Research, 130: 361-374.
[38] United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN - Habitat),(1998) Global Urban Indicators Database ,Version 2 , available in
[39] World Health Organization (1997), WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. Geneva:WHO.
[40] Zebardast E. (2009),The Housing Domain of Quality of Life and Life Satisfaction in the Spontaneous Settlements on the Tehran Metropolitan Fringe. Social Indicators Research:307-324.