‏»‏Site‏«‏‎ to ‎‏»‏place‏«‏‎ transformation; adapting and enhancing spatial capacities with ‎environmental capabilities

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master of Islamic Architecture, Department of Islamic Art and Architectur, Faculty of Art, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the process of spatial alteration, through which a mere physical entity (Site) is transformed into a meaningful, lived structure imbued with environmental values (Place). This is achieved by investigating the interactive relationship between the spatial capacities of a site and the environmental affordances of a place, thereby redefining its functions, perceptions, and identities. Conceptually, this alteration is a synthesis of environmental renewal, reconstruction, and retrofitting. The necessity for this inquiry stems from a critical observation: without a coherent framework, interventions in architecture and urbanism often degrade a site into a mere physical form that subjugates environmental capacities to human demands.

Methodologically, this qualitative study employs a bricolage approach, leveraging its flexibility to synthesize theories and resources from architecture, urban planning, philosophy, geography, and ecology. Utilizing MAXQDA software for a library-based data analysis, the study deconstructs multifaceted concepts such as 'site', 'place', 'environmental affordance', and 'alteration' through systematic coding and conceptual analysis of scholarly texts. The research process began by identifying a discursive context, followed by the formulation of a constructivist model to map the core concepts. This was followed by a stakeholder analysis of key actors, identifying their power dynamics and objectives. The identification of unexpected findings or ‘surprises’ challenged initial assumptions and led to the creation of a scenario portfolio. This portfolio models alternative futures for the spatial alteration of place, allowing for a multifaceted, dynamic, and non-linear exploration of the phenomenon. This constructivist and reflective process culminates in a conceptual model that illustrates the feedback loop between a site’s capacities and a place’s affordances, framing their synergy as the core of the alteration process.

The findings yielded four distinct scenarios for spatial alteration: "Algorithmic Smart Places," "Community-Based Eco-Compatible Places," "Consumptive and Fragmented Places," and "Dynamic and Synergistic Places through Adaptation". Furthermore, the study confirmed four research hypotheses, revealing that spatial alteration is a dynamic, multi-faceted process shaped by the interplay of technological, economic, social, ecological, and political forces. The quality of the resultant place is intrinsically dependent on the management of these interactions and the prioritization of values such as justice, sustainability, and meaning. The final analytical model provides a framework for understanding this complexity, guiding the alteration process toward the creation of places that are rich not only physically but also socially, culturally, and experientially. Analysis of current trends suggests a trajectory toward consumptive or algorithmically controlled places, yet growing socio-ecological awareness could bolster the potential for more eco-compatible and dynamic scenarios.

In conclusion, this research presents a conceptual framework and practical strategies for the regeneration of urban spaces and the enhancement of their identity, function, and perceived quality. The proposed scenarios serve as heuristic tools for theoretical exploration across different contexts and as practical instruments for participatory planning workshops, aiding in the formulation of flexible and adaptive urban policies. This study contributes to theoretical knowledge and professional practice in architecture and urbanism, aspiring to foster the creation of places that are not merely spaces for living, but environments for collective well-being.

Keywords

References

Albans, A. J. (2020). Geographical, physical site (Academic Dimension Conceptions Landscape Architecture). Birmingham City University. https://1library.net/article/geographical-physical-site-academic-dimension-conceptions-landscape-architecture.zl9dg6lz
Alsaleh, A. (2024). The impact of technological advancement on culture and society. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 32140.
Architectural Medicine. (2025, April 1). What is phenomenology (architecture) – architectural phenomenology. https://architecturalmedicine.com/phenomenology
lin, A. (2024, August 1). Understanding the importance of site analysis in architectural projects.
Deejos. https://www.deejos.com/blog/detail/understanding-the-importance-of-site-analysis-in-architectural-projects.html
Bachelard, G. (2014). The poetics of space. Penguin Classics.
Balducci, B., and Camilli, F. (2022). Designing ecology: The organic as a possible paradigm of a sustainable and resilient architecture. AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 11, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/1172022
Baper, S. Y., and Ismael, Z. K. (2024). The impact of site contexts in increasing the diversity of architectural concepts: Using an interactive architectural approach. Buildings, 14(8), Article 2567.
Beery, T. H., and Wolf-Watz, D. (2014). Nature to place: Rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.006
Ben-Asher, S. (2022). The virtuoso art of bricolage research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 991253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1068703
Brebbia, C. A., and Pulselli, R. (Eds.). (2014). Eco-architecture V. WIT Press.
Breuer, I. (2020). Husserl and Merleau-Ponty: The affective bodily experience of architectural space. Gestalt Theory, 42(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2020-0024
Campbell, C. E. (2017). Nature, place, and story: Rethinking historic sites in Canada. McGill-Queen's University Press. Casey, E. S. (2009). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press.
Chemero, A. (2024). Affordances. In M. C. Frank and A. Majid (Eds.), Open encyclopedia of cognitive science. MIT Press. Chiu, C. Y., Anand, B., and Gries, H. (2022, April 20). Globalization and intercultural relations.
Cilesiz, S., and Greckhamer, T. (2020). Methodological socialization and identity: A bricolage study of pathways toward qualitative research in doctoral education. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 337–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120980047
Design+Encyclopedia. (2025). Site. In Design•Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 20, 2026, from https://design-encyclopedia.com/?T=Site
Dovey, K. (2014). Framing places: Mediating power in built form (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Durante, A., Rivers, E., Beane, G., and Chau, R. (2017). Understanding the effect of architectural and environmental features on human behavior. In Advances in usability and user experience (521–531). Springer Nature.
Duyan, E. (2021). Architecture as metaphor and experience in Nâzým Hikmet’s last poems. Tasarım+Kuram, 17(32). https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.83792
Elegbede, I. O., and Zamboni, N. S. (2022). Ecology and ecosystem. In S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. D. Baldo, and R. Abreu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sustainable management (1–5). Springer.
Eslam-pour, S., Mir-riahi, S., and Habib, S. (2023). Analyzing the hidden dimensions of housing with a semantic approach in social housing, case study: Social housing settlements in Hamedan [Vakavi-ye ab'ad-e penhan-e sokunat ba ruykardi ma'nashenasaneh dar maskan-e ejtema'i, motale'eh-ye moredi: Sokunatgah-ha-ye maskan-e ejtema'i dar Hamedan]. Physical Development Planning, 8(1), 15–40. https://www.ensani.ir/fa/article/550404 (in Persian)
Erfani, G. (2022). Reconceptualising sense of place: Towards a conceptual framework for investigating individual-community-place interrelationships. Journal of Planning Literature, 37(3), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221081109
Farhangdoust, H., and Hanaee, T. (2026). A comparative study of government and governance: Investigating semantic differences in Iran’s contemporary urban planning and management system. Urban Economics and Planning, 7(2), 38–66. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2025.541868.1694
Farhangdoust, H., Hanaee, T., and Farkisch, H. (2024). Bridging the gap between theory and action: Implementing environmental theories in architecture and urban planning. International Journal of Architectural and Urban Development (IJAUP), 34(1). https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.838
Feilberg, C., Norlyk, A., and Keller, K. D. (2018). Studying the intentionality of human being. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 49(2), 214–246. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341347
Freestone, R., and Liu, E. (2016). Place and placelessness revisited. Routledge. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press.
Graells-Garrido, E., Serra-Burriel, F., Rowe, F., Cucchietti, F. M., and Reyes, (2021). A city of cities: Measuring how 15-minutes urban accessibility shapes human mobility in Barcelona. PLoS ONE, 16(5), Article e0250080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250080
Hagan, S. (2015, March 16). Ecological urbanism. The Architectural Review. https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/ecological-urbanism Heidegger, M. (2013). Poetry, language, thought.
Harper Perennial Modern Classics. Heras-Escribano, M., and Pinedo-García, M. D. (2018). Affordances and landscapes: Overcoming the nature–culture dichotomy through niche construction theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294
Hewitt, M. (2020). Space and place as architectural concepts: Confronting a puzzling dichotomy. Academy for Neuroscience in Architecture Conference (17–25). University of California Press.
Hinkson, M. (2017). Precarious placemaking. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46, 49–64.
Jaoude, G. A., Mumm, O., and Carlow, V. M. (2022). An overview of scenario approaches: A guide for urban design and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 37(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221083546
Jiang, B. (2024). The status quo of architecture and its impact on urban management: Christopher Alexander's insights. Journal of Urban Management, 13(4), 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2024.09.003
Jordaan, J. (2015). Constructing place: Towards a phenomenological framework for architecture in the twenty-first century (Publication No. 10204) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria]. UPSpace Institutional Repository.
Kaaronen, R. O. (2017). Affording sustainability: Adopting a theory of affordances as a guiding heuristic for environmental policy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 645.
LaGro, J. A., Jr. (2013). Site analysis: Informing context-sensitive and sustainable site planning and design (3rd ed.). Wiley. Lanng, D. B., and Jensen, O. B. (2022). A walk in the park: Affordance as urban design tool for creating inhabitable cities. In Z. Djebbara (Ed.), Affordances in everyday life (41–49). Springer Cham.
Leidi, M., and Schlüter, A. (2013). Exploring urban space: Volumetric site analysis for conceptual design in the urban context. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 11(2), 157–182. https://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/ijac201310202.pdf
Lems, A. (2023). Anti-mobile placemaking in a mobile world: Rethinking the entanglements of place, im/mobility and belonging. Mobilities, 18(4), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2220942
Lynch, K. (1976). What time is this place? The MIT Press.
Madanipour, A. (2017). Cities in time: Temporary urbanism and the future of the city. Bloomsbury Academic.
Main, K., and Sandoval, G. F. (2014). Placemaking in a translocal receiving community: The relevance of place to identity and agency. Urban Studies, 52(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014522720
Malpas, J. (2018). Place and experience: A philosophical framework (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Mateus, S., and Sarkar, S. (2024). Bricolage – a systematic review, conceptualization, and research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 36(7-8), 833–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2303426 McGrath, B. (2018). Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: The architecture and ecology of the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainabilityexport, 4(6), 1482730.
Mehan, A. (2016). Blank slate: Squares and political order of city. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(4), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2016.1246987
Mei, T. (2022, January 23). Heidegger on place and dwelling. LandandLiberty. https://landandliberty.net/heidegger-on-place-and-dwelling Merleau-Ponty, M. (2023). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
Moraveji, E., Zia-shahabi, P., and Hosseini, M. (2021). The concept of space in the phenomenology of Cassirer, Heidegger, and Schmitz [Mafhoume faza dar padidarshenasiye Cassirer, Heidegger va Schmitz]. Philosophical Investigations, 15(34), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.41348.2655 (in Persian)
Noghrekar, A., Jahanbakhsh, H., and Hamzehnejad, M. (2020). Man, nature, architecture [Ensan, tabi’at, memari] (5th ed.) (S. Litkouhi, Ed.). Payame Noor University. (in Persian)
Norberg-Schulz, C. (2021). The concept of dwelling: Towards a figurative architecture [Mafhum-e sokunat: Be su-ye me'mari-ye tamsili] (11th ed.) (M. Amiri-Yarahmadi, Trans.). Agah, Agah, Sepehr-e Kherad. (Original work published 1985) (in Persian)
Norberg-Schulz, C. (2021). The concept of dwelling: On the way to figurative architecture [Mafhoume sokounat: Be souye memariye tamsili] (11th ed.) (M. Amiriarahmadi, Trans.). Agah; Ageh; Sepehre Kherad. (in Persian)
Odegard, N. (2019). Making a bricolage: An immanent process of experimentation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 22(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119859370
Panj-tani, M., Mansourian, Y., and Mobini, M. (2017). Phenomenology of the aesthetic experience of place: A case study of Naqsh-e Jahan Square [Padidarshenasiye tajrobeye zibashenasaneh mekan: Motalee moredi meydane Naqshe Jahan]. Philosophical Investigations, 11(20), 23–60. https://www.ensani.ir/file/download/article/1560586057-9787-96-2.pdf (in Persian)
Picon, A. (2023). Dwelling in the digital age: Imagination, experience, and subjectivity. Footprint: Rethinking the Architecture of Dwelling in the Digital Age, 17(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.59490/FOOTPRINT.17.1.6830
Pinkster, F. M., and Loomans, D. (2025). Urban belonging as place-based affect. Social and Cultural Geography, 26(4), 421–438.
Prescott, H. (2011). Abandoned spaces and affect in the prose of Nicholas Royle and Iain Sinclair. In Rethinking urban space in contemporary British writing (84–139). University of Birmingham.
Kaminoff, R. (1983). PLACE-IDENTITY: PHYSICAL WORLD SOCIALIZATION OF THE SELF. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8
Rajala, K., Sorice, M. G., and Thomas, V. A. (2020). The meaning(s) of place: Identifying the structure of sense of place across a social–ecological landscape. People and Nature, 2(3), 718–733. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10112?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. University of Arizona Press.
Relph, E. (2022). Place and placelessness. SAGE Publications.
Rivero-Lamela, G. (2020). Christian Norberg-Schulz: Genius loci: Paesaggio, ambiente, architettura. Revista Proyecto, 23, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.12795/ppa.2020.i23.13
Rodell, S. (2023, August 1). Dwelling as placemaking. Rodell Design. https://rodell.design/journal/entry/dwelling-as-placemaking Rollino, A. C. (2024, June 12). On place and site. Rethinking Space and Place. https://rethinkingspaceandplace.com/2024/06/12/on-place-and-site
Rosenbluth, A., Ropert, T., Rivera, V., Villalobos-Morgado, M., Molina, Y., and Fernández, I. C. (2024). Between struggle, forgetfulness, and placemaking: Meanings and practices among social groups in a metropolitan urban park. Land, 13(6), Article 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060756
Sahan, A. H. (2021). Alienation in the urban structure and its impact on the individual and society. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(1).
Sanchez, H. S., Eski, M., and Batlle, I. C. (2024). Bricolage for innovative qualitative social science research: A perspective on its conceptual hallmarks. Qualitative Inquiry, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241234567 Scott, J. C. (2020). Seeing like a state. Yale University Press.
Seamon, D. (2018). Life takes place: Phenomenology, lifeworlds, and place making. Routledge.
Sedrez, M., Cheshmehzangi, A., Xie, L., and Wang, Y. (2024). Scenarios in an urban planning studio: The perception of multidisciplinary students. Sustainability, 16(13), Article 5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135586
Soltani, S., and Kirci, N. (2019). Phenomenology and space in architecture: Experience, sensation and meaning. International Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2019.06.1 Spychalska-Stasiak, J. (2020). Bricolage in scientific research practice: An attempt at grasping the meaning of the concept. Kultura i Edukacja, 128(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2020.02.07
Stevens, Q., Daly, J., and Dovey, K. (2024). Designing for possibility in public space: Affordance, assemblage, and ANT. URBAN DESIGN International, 29, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-023-00235-y?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
Tran, D. (2018). Phenomenology method of making a place. MATEC Web of Conferences, 193, Article 04021. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819304021
Tuan, Y. F. (1990). Topophilia. Columbia University Press.
Tuan, Y. F. (2001). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
Vey, J. S., and Love, H. (2019, November 19). Transformative placemaking: A framework to create connected, vibrant, and inclusive communities. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/transformative-placemaking-a-framework-to-create-connected-vibrant-and-inclusive-communities
WATG. (2025, February 4). Transforming spaces into places. https://www.watg.com/transforming-spaces-into-places Yurevna, K. O., Nikolaevic, G. V., and Valentinovna, G. E. (2019). Globalization as a factor of socio-cultural transformations. In Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism (3047–3051). Future Academy.
Zipf, R. (2016). A bricoleur approach to navigating the methodological maze. In B. Harreveld, M. Danaher, and C. Lawson (Eds.), Constructing methodology for qualitative research (45–59). Palgrave Macmillan.
اسلام‌پور، شیما؛ میرریاحی، سعید و حبیب، سعید. (1402). واکاوی ابعاد پنهان سکونت با رویکردی معناشناسانه در مسکن اجتماعی، مطالعه موردی: سکونتگاه‌های مسکن اجتماعی در همدان. برنامه‌ریزی توسعه کالبدی، 8(1)، ۱۵ - ۴۰. https://www.ensani.ir/fa/article/550404
پنج تنی، منیره؛ منصوریان، یزدان و مبینی، مهتاب. (1396). پدیدارشناسی تجربۀ زیباشناختی مکان: مطالعة موردی میدان نقش‌جهان. پژوهش‌های فلسفی، 11(20)، 23-60. https://www.ensani.ir/file/download/article/1560586057-9787-96-2.pdf
مروجی، احسان؛ ضیاء شهابی، پرویز و حسینی، مالک. (1400). مفهوم فضا در پدیدارشناسی کاسیرر، هایدگر و اشمیتس. پژوهش‌های فلسفی، 15(34)، 363-380. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.41348.2655
نقره‌کار، عبدالحمید؛ جهانبخش، حیدر و حمزه نژاد، مهدی. (1399). انسان، طبیعت، معماری (چاپ پنجم). (ساناز لیتکوهی، ویراستار). تهران: دانشگاه پیام نور.
نوربرگ-شولتس، ک. (1400). مفهوم سکونت: به سوی معماری تمثیلی (چاپ یازدهم) (محمود امیر یاراحمدی، مترجم). آگاه، آگه، سپهر خرد. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1985)
Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning
Volume 31, Issue 1
June 2026
Pages 47-73

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics