Analysis of Authenticity Recognition Components in Cultural Heritage Conservation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran

2 Assistant Professor, School of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University

Abstract

Following the development and the qualitative and quantitative changes in communities, that have made substantial changes in historic environments; the authenticity concept has attracted attention in order to strike a balance between conservation and development approaches. The concept of authenticity has a fundamental role in balancing the plans and measures of historic urban heritage revitalization. Thus, the more consistent the new developments are with the concept of authenticity, the more integrated and balanced they will be with conservation. Authenticity possesses abstract origin and roots of the significance and value of the property and is as a transmitter of values and significance of cultural heritage has played the major role in the process of registration, conservation and management of cultural heritage .Authenticity as a multi-layered concept which has the role of transmitting values and significance of cultural heritage has found a special position in the process of recognition and conservation of heritage. As a result, developing a conceptual framework and following that, determining criteria for its evaluation in international documents and theories have been particularly emphasised. Thus, this paper; related to identification of authenticity, recognition components in cultural heritage conservation, poses its main question and works toward its main goal which is to develop a conceptual framework by determining the effective components in authenticity recognition based on analysis of international documents, conventions, and experts’ opinions. In this regard, this paper begins with reading and analysing international documents and conventions and theories related to the concept of authenticity in the field of cultural heritage, and then determines the aspects and dimensions explaining the concept of authenticity. Based on research questions and goals, the qualitative research methodology is chosen and with applying logical reasoning strategy as well as “content analysis” and “logical inference”; Moreover, reading and evidential observation based on books, papers and authentic documents are used as research tools.This paper aims to analyze the content by recognizing and categorizing international documents, conventions and theories. So, by determining the effective components in authenticity concept recognition;  based on the literature review, the context for developing an authenticity conceptual framework in cultural heritage is provided. Based on the conducted analysis, five main components in authenticity, recognition are deduced that can be presented as two Tangible and Intangible aspects, as well as three dimensions of Stability, Continuity and Change. In addition, the evolution of heritage concept, from a solo monument to complexes, urban contexts, and beyond that to Cultural Landscape and Historic Urban Landscape, reveals that the more the scale of the view towards heritage changes from small to large; on one hand the more importance the intangible aspect gains. On the other hand, change and transformation which are inherent in heritage authenticity; beside the continuity of a stable condition, are more paid attention and discussed. Therefore, the current level of understanding of authenticity can be approached to develop a conceptual framework on the condition that the presented dual aspects and triple dimensions are considered in a complementary and consistent relation as an intertwined phenomena.
 

Keywords

References

Andrews, T.D.; Buggey, S. (2008), Authenticity in Aboriginal Cultural Landscape, In Waite, Diana. (Ed.), APT Bulletin (pp. 63-70), Vol. XXXIX, No.2-3, Published by Association for Preservation Technology International.
Araoz, G.F. (2008), World-Heritage Historic Urban Landscapes: Defining and Protecting Authenticity, In Waite, Diana. (Ed.), APT Bulletin (pp. 33-37), Vol. XXXIX, No.2-3, Published by Association for Preservation Technology International.
Declaration of San Antonio (1996), Authenticity in the Conservation and Management of the Cultural Heritage, Available at: http://www.icomos.org/index.php/en/charters-and-texts (Accessed: May 2010).
ICOMOS (1964), International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter), Available at: http://www.international.icomos.org/centre_documentation/chartes_eng.htm. (Accessed: May 2008).
ICOMOS Charter (1994), the Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Available at: http://icomos.org/index.php/en/charters-and-texts. (Accessed: May 2010).
ICOMOS Charter (2008), Charter on Cultural Routes, Available at: http://www.icomos.org/index.php/en/charters-and-texts. (Accessed: May 2010).
Jokilehto J. (2006), Considerations on authenticity and integrity in world heritage context. City & Time 2 (1): 1. [online] URL:http://www.ct.ceci-br.org.
Jokilehto, J. (2007), International charters on urban conservation: some thoughts on the principles expressed in current international doctrine.  City & Time, 3 (3): 2. [Online] URL: http://www.ct.ceci-br.org.
Mitchell, N. (2008), Considering the Authenticity of Cultural Landscape, In Waite, Diana. (Ed.), APT Bulletin (pp. 25-32), Vol. XXXIX, No.2-3, Published by Association for Preservation Technology International.
Mitchell, N.; Rossler, M.; Tricaud, P. (2009), World Heritage Cultural Landscapes: A Handbook for Conservation and Management, World Heritage Paper 26, Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Center. 
Rossler, M. (2008), Applying Authenticity to Cultural Landscapes, In Waite, Diana. (Ed.), APT Bulletin (pp. 47-54), Vol. XXXIX, No.2-3, Published by Association for Preservation Technology International.
Stovel, H. (2007), Effective use of authenticity and integrity as world heritage qualifying conditions. City & Time, 2 (3): 3. [Online] URL: http://www.ct.ceci-br.org.
UNESCO World Heritage Center (1978), Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention, World Heritage Center, Paris. 
UNESCO World Heritage Center (2003), Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001325/132540e.pdf [Visited on 12 Desember, 2012].
UNESCO World Heritage Center (2005), Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, World Heritage Committee and World Heritage Centre.
Van Balen, K. (2008), The Nara Grid: An Evaluation Scheme Based on the Nara Document on Authenticity, In Waite, Diana. (Ed.), APT Bulletin (pp. 39-45), Vol. XXXIX, No.2-3, Published by Association for Preservation Technology International.
Zancheti, S.M.; Flaviana, L.; Rosane Piccolo (2009), Judging the authenticity of the city. In N. Stanley-Price & J. King (Eds.), conserving the authentic: essays in honour of Jukka Jokilehto (pp. 163-168), ICCROM Conservation Studies, and International Center for the study of preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property.
 
 
Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning
Volume 19, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
November 2015
Pages 77-86

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics