رابطه سیستم فعالیت‌های جمعی و پیکربندی خانه های کوهدشت با رویکرد نحو فضا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه گلستان

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به بررسی رابطه متقابل بین پیکربندی فضایی و نظام فعالیت ها در مقیاس عرصه‌های جمعی از طریق دسته بندی فعالیت‌های جمعی و اندازه‌گیری داده های نحوی خانه‌ها می پردازد. برای تعیین خواسته مورد نظر تعداد 110 خانه از سه گونه مسکن کوهدشت به صورت غیر تصادفی با توجه به روش مبتنی بر هدف و ملاحظات انتخاب گردید؛ برای تحلیل فعالیت‌های جمعی از مصاحبه ابزار–غایت، مشاهده و ثبت فعالیت‌ها استفاده شد و برای همخوانی و پیدایی مهمترین فعالیت‌ها از روش تحلیل تناظر استفاده شد. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از آنست، گونه‌های مسکن پیکربندی‌های متفاوتی دارند اما با وجود تغییر پیکربندی فضایی، سیستم فعالیت‌ها تغییر نکرده و ساکنان خود را با فضاهای مورد نظر انطباق داده اند. میزان پاسخ گویی ساکنان به تطبیق پذیری بستگی به تامین نیازهای فضایی-رفتاری آنها دارد؛ بنابراین استمرار سیستم فعالیت‌ها نشان از قدرت قانونمندی های فرهنگی- اجتماعی است. ساکنان ترجیحات کالبدی خود را با تغییرات تطبیق داده و رفتارها، ارزش‌ها و نیازهای خود را با آن هماهنگ می کنند. توانایی افراد در انطباق با محیط، نتایج تحلیل‌های نحو فضا را مورد تردید قرار می‌دهد، لذا پیشنهاد می‌شود جهت اعتبار بخشی بیشتر به تحلیل های نحوی سطح رضایتمندی نیز بررسی گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The relationship between system of activities and configuration Kuhdasht houses with space syntax approach

نویسنده [English]

  • abdolmajid nourtaghani
چکیده [English]

This study examined the effects of spatial configuration of the system of collective activity areas are houses. For this purpose it is necessary degree of integration and resolution of configuration and system houses as collective field activities to be monitored home. The study was based on the analysis from selected samples of 110 traditional and moder4nization of house layouts in Kuhdasht city, through adopting the theory of space syntax and its techniques (gamma analysis method).For the analysis of collective activities of Means-End model and Research Viewing lifestyle between families was used and for greater compatibility and visibility of the activities of collective areas in three neighborhoods of correspondence analysis was used. This study, interpret and identify the relationship between spatial configuration and changes in the field of collective scale through collective activities Categories, the main features of space systems and measurement and numerical data and its impact on the houses is a pattern. Socio-cultural characteristics of inhabitants, housing configuration to affect the day. The system of activities and rules governing the relations between the inhabitants will be configured. So a cultural group with genotype housing should be the same. The results show that by changing the spatial configuration, the system does not change, but inhabitants of the house with your activities to adapt their spaces. Its inhabitants and housing on the basis of the gain relationship between family structures explains the compatibility and adaptation. But the response of residents to adaptability actually to create facilities that are factor or potential in houses and through the forms and meanings to adapt space needs, behavioral and psychological humans depend. Another result of this study was that in all three types of housing, among other of individual sectors and collective sectors of home services sectors, with the highest integration and has the lowest depths of space.
This is a testament to adapt the structure of the home space with the system is of activities. This implies that the value of high integration collective space facilitates collaborative activities and social events.So that most the inhabitants relations and social media activities with guests as it happens. The continuity of the power system collective field activities, social and cultural laws Research findings showed that despite the change in the spatial configuration and remove some areas of collective spaces, the system will the continuity of activities in this field. The study suggests the absence of such relationships the continuity of system collective field activities show Correlation events with cultural and social - cultural laws so that configuration changes created space and no significant effect on the events.Inhabitants preferences of your physical adjust to changes and behaviors, values and match it to your needs. Ability of individuals to adapt to the environment, analysis of space syntax doubt, so it suggested to validate the syntax analysis the level of satisfaction to be evaluated the more. In other words, the configuration space, the spatial organization and different means of creating social - cultural, the ultimate goal of all this effort.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "space syntax"
  • "spatial configuration"
  • "collective sector"
  • "system of activities"
  • "adaptability"
  • "social and cultural rules"

مراجع

  گروت، لیندا؛ دیوید وانگ (1384)، روش­های تحقیق در معماری، ترجمه علیرضا عینی فر، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
  نورتقانی، عبدالمجید؛ پوردیهیمی، شهرام؛ صالح صدق پور، بهرام؛ نظری، عبدالحمید؛ (1395)، ساخت، رواسازی، پایاسازی ابزار رمزگشایی انتظام معنای مسکن ترکمن، مسکن و محیط روستا، شماره 156، صص 3-14.
Ahrentzen, S; Levine, D & Michelson, W (1989), Space, time and Activity in the Home: a gender analysis, In Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 9, 89-101.
Bafna, Sonia )2003(, Space Syntax A Brief Introduction to Its Logic and Analytical Techniques, Environment and Behaviour, Vol. 35 No. 1, January 2003 17-29, DOI: 10. 1177/ 0013916502238863, Sage Publications.
Coolen, Henny and Janine Meesters (2012), Private and public green spaces: meaningful but different settings, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27 (1), 49-67.
Coolen, Henny (2008), the meaning of dwelling features, Conceptual and methodological issues, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
Dalton, Ruth Conroy & Banfa, Sonit, (2003), The syntactical image of the city: A reciprocal definition of spatial elemants and spatial syntaxes, proceeding, 4th International space syntaxSymposium, London.                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
Dursun, P and G. Saglamer (2003), Spatial analysis of different   home   environments   in   the   city   of Trabzon, Proceeding of the 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, June 17-19, University College London, London, pp 1-18.
Dursun, Pelin (2007), Space Syntax in Architectural Design, 6th International space syntax Symposium, Istanbul.                                                                                      
Edja, Trigueiro (2015), Is there a Brazilian home? An overview of domestic space and modes oflife, Proceedings of the 10th  International  Space  Syntax Symposium.           
Eid, Dina; K., Shehayeb & Yaldiz, Y (2004), Determinants of Activity Patterns in Egyptian Homes: A space syntax analysis of use, Paper to be presented at the ENHR ConferenceJuly 2nd-6th 2004, Cambridge, UK.
Eid, Y (1993), Bi-Polarity and Interface in the Spatial Organization of Cairo Apartments, UMI publications, MI, USA.
Hanson, J (1998), Decoding Homes and Houses, Cambridge University Press, U.K.
 Hillier, B and Hanson, J) 1984(, the Social Logic of Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hillier, B and J. Hanson (1989), The Social Logic of Space, 1st Edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hillier, B (1993), Architecture as theory: Specifically architectural knowledge, Harv. Archit. Rev., 9, 8-27.
Hillier, B (1999), Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture, 1st Edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hillier, B (2008), Space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory, Build.Res.Inform.,36:216230.DOI:10.1080/09613210801928073.
Hillier, B; J. Hanson & H. Graham (1987a.), Ideas are in things:  An application of the space syntax method to discovering houses genotypes, Environ. Plann. B: Plann, Dec, 14, 363-385.
Hillier, B; J. Hanson & J. Peponis (1987b), Syntactic analysis of settlements. Archit. Behav., 3, 217-231.
Hillier, B; Hanson, J & Orhun, D (1995), spatial types intraditional Turkish houses, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, 475-498.
Janine, MEESTERS (2009), The meaning of activities in the dwelling and residential environment A structural approach in people-environment relations, Thesis Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
 Jeong, Sang Hyu & Ban, Yong un (2011), computational algorithms to evaluate design solutions using space syntax, Computer-Aided Design, 43, 664-676.                                     
Karlen, M  (2009), Space Planning Basics, 3rd  Edn., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
Kent, S (1984), Analyzing Activity Areas: an ethnoarchaeological study of the use of space, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
Levi Strauss, C (1967), Structural Anthropology, 1st Edn, Anchor Books, New York.
Monteiro, C.G (1997), Activity analysis in houses of Recife-Brazil, Proceeding of the 1st International Space Syntax Symposium,  University College London, London, 1-14.
Mustafa, F.A (2010), Using space syntax analysis in detecting privacy: A comparative study of traditional and modern house layouts in Erbil city, Iraq, Asian Soc. Sci., 6: 157-166.
Psarra, S (2010), The Ghost of 'Conceived Space' What Kind of Work Does or Should Space Syntax Perform for Architecture?, JOSS, 1.1, pp 17-20.
Rabeneck, Andrew; David; Sheppard & Peter Town (1974), Housing – Flexibility/Adaptability?, Architectural Design, vol. 44), pp. 76–91.
Rapoport, A (1969), Levels of meaning in the built environment, in: Poyatos, F. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, C.J. Hogrefe, Toron- to, pp. 317-336.
Rapoport, A (1990), Systems of activities and systems of settings. In Susan Kent (Ed.) Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rapoport, A (1995), A critical look at the concept ‘home’, in: Benjamin, D.N. and D. Stea (Eds), the home: words, interpretations, meanings, and the environment, Aldershot, Avebury, pp. 25-52.
Rapoport, A (2005), Culture, architecture, and design, Locke, Chicago.
Saatci, M (2015), Spatial  hierarchy  on  vernacular  houses  in Eastern  Black  Sea  Region, Turkey, Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, pp: 10.1-10.17
Scott, M (2005), A Powerful Theory and a Paradox: Ecological Psychologists after Barker, Journal of Environment and Behavior, 37 (3), 295-329.
Wicker, Allan (1979), an Introduction to Ecological Psychology, NY: Cambridge University  Press, New York.
Wicker, Allan (2012), Perspectives on Behavior Settings: With illustrations from Allison’s ethnography of a Japanese hostess club, Environment and Behavior, 44, 474–492.
Wineman, J; Peponis, J & Conrey Dalton, R (2006), Exploring, Engaging, understanding in Museums. In Holscher, ch. Conroy Dalton, R & Turner, A. Space syntax and spatial cognition, Proceeding of the Workshop held in Breman, Germany.                                                                                                        
Zako, R (2005), The Power of the Veil:  Gender Inequality in the Domestic Setting of Traditional Courtyard Houses. In: Courtyard Housing: Past, Present and Future, Edward, B., M. Sibley, M. Hakmi and P. Land (Eds.) Taylor and Francis Group, London, ISBN: 10: 0415262720, pp: 65-70.
 
نشریه هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی
دوره 22، شماره 1
خرداد 1396
صفحه 65-74

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار